Injury is always a problem for professional athletes in sport and every athlete and sports team are normally examining ways to avoid injuries. You can find basically two types of injury which could occur in sport. One is the accident that is much harder to avoid and will depend on techniques such as rule modifications to defend participants and the use of protective equipment. One other kind of injury would be the one linked to the training workloads which is generally an overuse type of injury. To circumvent these types of injuries, then there ought to be a careful control over simply how much work or training which the athlete performs. It is important that exercise loads are increased little by little so that the athlete's body has time to adjust to the loads that are. If there's a lot of load, then an injury is more prone to come about.
There has been developed a number of keeping track of resources in which are employed to keep a check up on the athlete's training to make sure they have acceptable rests and down time in order that the body can adapt to those loads. A specific issue is when the athlete has a spike or sudden rise in the training load in comparison to the background exercise load. A ratio, referred to as the acute:chronic workload ratio was formulated with the acute workload being just what the athlete has been doing in the last 7 days and the chronic workload being what they have trained in the last thirty day period. Should there be a spike in that ratio, they'll likely are considered to be at risk for injury. Although this does appear reasonably clear-cut, there is definitely important controversy about the research which support this ratio. A recently available episode of PodChatLive talked about these troubles with Franco Impellizzeri on these trouble with the concept and ways in which it could be adapted forward into the long run.